Contact Us

Tel:0371-63387308
      0371-65330928
E-mail:guoshuxuebao@caas.cn

Home-Journal Online-2024 No.8

Identification of tangelo varieties with InDel markers

Online:2024/8/16 11:10:30 Browsing times:
Author: YU Xin, GUO Yi, LIU Xiaofeng, WAN Runchu, JIANG Dong, CAO Li
Keywords: Citrus; Tangelo; InDel; Molecular marker; Genetic diversity
DOI: 10.13925/j.cnki.gsxb.20240033
Received date: 2024-01-16
Accepted date: 2024-04-26
Online date: 2024-08-10
PDF Abstract

Abstract:ObjectiveTangelo is a type of citrus hybrid that has mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco) and pummelo [C. maxima (Burm.) Merr.] pedigrees. Owing to the characteristic blended flavors of mandarin and pummelo, tangelo is increasingly favoured by consumers, and receiving attentions from citrus breeders. Besides the conventional tangeloes such as Sweet Spring and Haruka, previously we have developed two elite tangelo varieties called Yangguang No. 1 and Yangguang No. 2 derived from a crossing of Ehime Kashi No. 28 and Haruka. At present, the cultivated area of Yangguang No. 1 is expanding. Precise and efficient variety identification is crucial for protecting plant variety rights. Molecular markers, such as SNP, SSR and InDel, have been broadly applied for genotyping, variety identification, genetic diversity analysis and pre- selection in various crops. This study aimed to discover whole- genome InDels by comparison of whole-genome sequencing data of Yangguang No. 1, Yangguang No. 2 and their parents, and developed agarose gel-resolved InDel markers for genotyping and discriminating different tangelo varieties. Furthermore, the application of the selected InDel markers for genetic analysis of a wider range of citrus germplasm resources was also investigated.MethodsThe plant materials for whole genome re-sequencing were the healthy leaves of Yangguang No. 1 and Yangguang No. 2, and their female parent Ehime Kashi No. 28 and male parent Haruka. Ten tangelo varieties were testedfor the genotyping, discrimination and identification with the selected InDel markers. Altogether, 20 mandarins, 10 tangeloes, 2 pummeloes, 5 sweet oranges [C. sinensis (L.) Osbeck], 2 citrons (C. medica L.), 3 lemons [C. limon (L.) Burm. f.], 2 yuzues (C. junos Siebold. ex Tanaka), 2 grapefruits (C. paradisi Macf.), 2 kumquats (Fortunella spp.), 3 trifoliate oranges (Poncirus trifoliata Raf.) were used for genetic diversity analysis. The whole-genome re-sequencing was carried out with NovaSeq 6000 Sequencer (Illumina Inc., San Diego, USA) in Biomarker Technologies (Beijing, China). The clean reads were mapped against the genome of clementine mandarin (https://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov/pz/portal.html) using BWA. The GATK was used to call and filter InDels; and the SnpEff was applied for variant annotation. The primers for detecting the InDels were designed with BatchPrimer3 according to the flanking sequences. Population genetic parameters including major allele frequency (MAF), number of alleles (Na), number of genotypes (Ng), effective number of alleles (Ne), expected heterozygosity (He), observed heterozygosity (Ho) and polymorphic information contents (PIC) were calculated using PowerMarker V3.25. The PCoA was conducted usingade4package of R program, and then the scatter plot was performed usingggplot2package.ResultsThe four varieties generated 10 million clean paired-end reads with 3 billion base, Q20 and Q30 of >96% and 92%, properly mapped ratio of 85%, 1× and 5× coverage ratio of 89.9% and 67.95% and average depth of 7×. A total of 285757, 338510, 320991 and 296648 InDels in 281458, 330079, 314081 and 289508 loci were called in the genomes of Ehime Kashi No.28, Haruka, Yangguang No. 1 and Yangguang No. 2, respectively. Clearly, InDels and InDel loci in the genome of Haruka was more than those of Ehime Kashi No. 28. Indeed, it is reasonable to deduce that Ehime Kashi No. 28 (Nanko × Amakusa), whose female parent Nanko has half clementine mandarin pedigree, should show more identity to clementine mandarin than the other three. Moreover, it was not surprising that their hybrid offspring, Yangguang No. 1 and Yangguang No. 2 had the intermediate amounts of InDels and InDel loci compared with their parents. After removing the common InDels among the different varieties, we identified 607376 InDel loci (657414 variants) with an average density of 1.08 InDel/locus. Most (92.5% , 561914) of the loci had one InDel, and 41112, 4127, 220 and 3 loci had two, three, four and five InDels, respectively. The majority (488 369, 80.4%) of InDel loci were intergenic, whereas only 19.6% (119 007) were intragenic. Most of the InDel were mononucleotide, followed by dinucleotide. Notably, we observed that 5315 (2.1%), 6402 (2.2%), 6226 (2.2%) and 5766 (2.3%) InDels were 30 or < -30 bp in length. They could be potentially used as InDel markers that could be detected through simple agarose gel electrophoresis. With the genomic DNA of the 10 tangeloes and Ehime Kashi No. 28 as templates, the PCR products corresponding to the 48 InDels were successfully amplified, and the bands could be separated by 2.5% agarose gel electrophoresis. The genotypes of the tested tangeloes and Ehime Kashi No. 28 could be unambiguously and easily discriminative with these InDel markers. Moreover, a total of 51 citrus germplasm resources were further genotyped with these InDel markers. The PICs of these 48 markers in the total 51 citrus germplasms ranged from 0.055 to 0.450 with an average of 0.281; the MAFs ranged from 0.510 to 0.971 with an average of 0.739; the Ho and He were in the range of 0.039 to 0.647 and 0.059 to 0.546 with averages of 0.306 and 0.350, respectively. Some markers with higher He, PIC and lower MAFs, for example I3_744, I7_170, I8_516, I8_533 and I9_669, showing high genetic diversity, were potentially important for the genetic diversity analysis for citrus crops. In addition, we built a PCoA plot to illustrate the genetic distances among all the 51 varieties. The different varieties within same types generally tended to cluster close, fitting the conventional citrus taxonomic system, although the mandarin and kumquat groups were relatively scattering, which could be explained by interspecific or intergenetic hybrids.However, the precise genetic relations among these citrus germplasms could not be inferred from the PCoA.ConclusionsThe genome-wide InDels from two novel tangeloes and their parents were characterised. Forty-eight InDels (30 or <-30 bp) would be useful for the effective discrimination and identification of various tangeloes through low-cost agarose gel electrophoresis. They also would be applicable for genetic diversity and classification of true citrus fruit tree group.